Volume 2, Issue 2, April 2017, Page: 50-54
Correlation and Prediction for Preparatory Year Math and Discrete Structure in University of Hail
Azhari Ahmad, Department of MATH, Preparatory Year, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabi
Received: Jan. 16, 2017;       Accepted: Feb. 10, 2017;       Published: Mar. 2, 2017
DOI: 10.11648/j.her.20170202.14      View  1807      Downloads  88
This paper aim to investigate the correlation between preparatory Mathematics and Discrete Structure course studied in the Faculty of computer sciences after passing Prep-MATH. a linear regression equation was used as a model for early prediction of the performance of the student in Discrete Structure, Prep-MATH was considered as independent variable (predictor), while Discrete MATH was considered as the dependent variable (respondent). This study is carried out on student’s results data which consisted of 78 students, finished successfully their studies in Prep-Year on 2012, and enrolled in the Faculty of Computer Sciences. The results, which are verified by using paired t-test and Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, indicated that Prep-Year Math courses and Discrete Structure) are significantly correlated. Prediction of the performance of the students in Discrete Structure was obtained in base of their performance in Prep-Year MATH through linear regression.
Correlation, Prediction, Preparatory-Math, Discrete Structure
To cite this article
Azhari Ahmad, Correlation and Prediction for Preparatory Year Math and Discrete Structure in University of Hail, Higher Education Research. Vol. 2, No. 2, 2017, pp. 50-54. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20170202.14
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Achieve Inc. 2013. Closing the expectations gap: 2013 annual report on the alignment of state K–12 policies and practices with the demands of college and careers. Washington, DC. www.achieve.org/ClosingtheExpectationsGap2013. Accessed February 2015.
A. Kostochka, J. Verstraete, Turan problems and shadows III: expansions of graphs SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 29 (2015), no. 2, 868—876.
Adams, P. A., Kaczmarczyk, S., Picton, P. & Demian, P (2007). Improving Problem Solving and Encouraging Creativity in Computer Sciences Undergraduates. International Conference on Computer Sciences Education, Portugal.
A. Awodun, O. J. O. Omotade, and O. Adeniyi, “Mathemtics skills as predictors of physics student's performance in senior secondary schools,” International Journal of Science and Research, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 391–394, 2013. View at Google Scholar.
Brent Bridgeman, Laura McCamley-Jenkins, and Nancy Ervin. Predictions of freshman grade-point average from the revised and recentered SAT I: Reasoning test. ETS Research Report Series, 2000 (1): i–16, 2000.
Belfield CR, Crosta PM. 2012. Predicting success in college: The importance of placement tests and high school transcripts. CCRC Working Paper No. 42.
Elizabeth Fennema and Julia A. Sherman Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Vol. 7, No. 5 (Nov., 1976), pp. 324-326.
Gaertner MN, Kim J, DesJardins SL, McClarty KL. 2014. Preparing students for college and careers: The causal role of algebra II. Research in Higher Education 55 (2): 143–65.
Gamoran A, Hannigan EC. 2000. Algebra for everyone? Benefits of college-preparatory Mathematics for students with diverse abilities in early secondary school. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 22 (3): 241–54.
Gray L, Thomas N, Lewis L. 2010a. Educational technology in U. S. public schools: Fall 2008. NCES 2010-034. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010034.pdf. Accessed December 2014.
Green, D., Harrison, M. & Ward, J. (2003).. Mathematics for engineers - the helm Project. Conference on Strategies for Student Achievement in Computer Sciences. UK. Available: http://www.hull.ac.uk/engprogress/prog3papers/progress3_HELM_final.pd.
Ely, D. P., & Hittle, L. (1990). The impact of Math background on performance in managerial economics and basic finance courses. Journal of Financial Education, 19 (2), 59–61.
Green, J. J., Stone, C. C., Zegeye, A., & Charles, T. A. (2007). Changes in Math Prerequisites and Student Performance in Business Statistics: Do Math Prerequisites Really Matter? Journal of Economics and Finance Education, 6 (2), 27–38.
Henderson, S. & Broadbridge, P. (2009). Computer Sciences Mathematics Education in Australia. MSOR Connections 9 (1): 12–17.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative Learning Methods: A Meta Analysis. Available: http://www.tablelearning.com/uploads/File/EXHİBİT-B.pdf.
J. Cooper Coloring sparse hypergraphs SIAM J. Discrete Math. 30 (2016), no. 2, 1165--1180.
J. Lenz, Eigenvalues of non-regular linear-quasirandom hypergraphs, Discrete Math. 340 (2017), no. 2, 145--153.
Johnson, M., & Kuennen, E. (2006). Basic Math Skills and Performance in an Introductory Statistics Course. Journal of Statistics Education, 14 (2). Retrieved from www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v14n2/johnson.html Research in Higher Education Journal Calculus and success, page 7.
Klymchuk, Sergiy & Norbert Gruenwald (202), Investigating The Ways Of Reducing The Gap Between The School And University Mathematics--An International Study.
Lopez, A. (2007). Mathematics Education for 21st Century Computer Sciences Students: Literature Review. Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute. Available: http://www.amsi.org.au/carrick.php.
Merriman, B., Shiel, G., Cosgrove, J., & Perkins, R. (2014). Project Maths and PISA 2012: Performance in Initial Project Maths schools and in Non-initial schools on PISA 2012 Mathematics and Problem-solving and on Junior Certificate Mathematics. Dublin: Educational Research Centre.
Mustoe, L. & Lowson, D (Editors) (2002). Mathematics for the European Engineer A Curriculum for the Twenty –First Century. SEFI Mathematics Working Group. SEFI HQ, Brussells, Belgium, ISBN 2-87352-045-0. 16. Weisberg S. Applied Linear Regression. 2nd. ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1985.
Reason, R. (2003). Student variables that predict retention: Recent research and new developments. The NASPA Journal, 40 (4), 172- 191. Retrieved May 3 1, 2005, from: http://publications.naspa.org/naspaj ournal.v040/iss4/art 10.
Zimmerman, D. W. (1997). Teacher’s corner: A note on interpretation of the paired-samples t test. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22 (3), 349-360.
Browse journals by subject